Second Annual Global E-Government Study Shows Taiwan, South Korea, and Canada Overtaking United States

Providence, RI-A new study of global e-government undertaken by researchers at Brown University shows that Taiwan, South Korea, and Canada have overtaken the United States in e-government performance.

The second annual survey conducted by Professor Darrell M. West of the Taubman Center for Public Policy at Brown University, measured each country's on-line presence on a 100-point scale using more than two dozen different criteria, including the availability of contact information, publications, databases, portals, privacy, security, disability access, and the number of online services. A previous study of global e-government was released last year.

This year's study reviewed 1,197 national government websites in 198 countries during June and July, 2002. Among the sites analyzed were those of executive offices, legislative offices, judicial offices, Cabinet offices, and major agencies serving crucial functions of government, such as health, human services, taxation, education, interior, economic development, administration, natural resources, foreign affairs, foreign investment, transportation, military, tourism, and business regulation.

Last year's global leader in digital government, the United States, dropped to fourth place (60.1), behind Taiwan (72.5), South Korea (64) and Canada (61.1). Chile moved up to fifth place with 60 points, followed by Australia with 58.3 points. The following table shows how each of the world's 198 countries ranked on e-government performance in 2002.

1. Taiwan

72.5

2. South Korea

64.0

3. Canada

61.1

4. United States

60.1

5. Chile

60.0

6. Australia

58.3

7. China

56.3

8. Switzerland

55.4

9. Great Britain

54.8

10. Singapore

53.5

11. Germany

52.6

12. Vanuatu

52.0

12. Bahrain

52.0

12. Qatar

52.0

12. Vatican

52.0

12. Japan

52.0

12. Mexico

52.0

12. Togo

52.0

19, Fiji

52.0

20. Zambia

52.0

21. Malaysia

51.5

22. Hong Kong

51.3

23. Israel

50.9

23. France

50.9

25. Yemen

50.0

26. Iceland

49.8

27. Sweden

49.1

28. Finland

48.8

29. Lithuania

48.4

30. Italy

48.3

31. Liechtenstein

48.0

31. Colombia

48.0

31. Cuba

48.0

31. Belize

48.0

31. Marshall Islands

48.0

31. Ireland

48.0

31. Estonia

48.0

31. Maldives

48.0

31. Botswana

48.0

31. Venezuela

48.0

41. Norway

47.7

42. Austria

47.4

43. St. Lucia

47.3

44. Malta

47.2

44. Uganda

47.2

46. Denmark

47.0

46. El Salvador

47.0

46. Ecuador

47.0

46. Senegal

47.0

50. Latvia

46.9

51. Trinidad

46.4

52. Jordan

46.3

53. Swaziland

46.2

54. Turkey

46.0

55. Malawi

45.3

55. Belgium

45.3

55. Kyrgyzstan

45.3

58. Poland

45.1

58. India

45.1

58. Macedonia

45.1

61. Lebanon

45.0

62. Spain

44.9

63. Luxembourg

44.6

63. Czech Republic

44.6

65. Iran

44.0

65. Nepal

44.0

65. Thailand

44.0

65. Grenada

44.0

65. Netherlands

44.0

65. Kenya

44.0

65. Angola

44.0

65. Tunisia

44.0

65. Sudan

44.0

65. Mozambique

44.0

65. Haiti

44.0

76. Croatia

43.4

77. Armenia

43.3

78. Guyana

42.7

78. Bosnia

42.7

80. Philippines

42.4

81. New Zealand

42.3

81. Hungary

42.3

83. South Africa

42.0

83. Cape Verde

42.0

83. Romania

42.0

86. Brazil

41.8

86. Argentina

41.8

88. Slovenia

41.7

89. Greece

41.5

90. Azerbaijan

41.3

91. Bulgaria

41.1

92. Egypt

41.0

93. Morocco

40.9

94. Cambodia

40.8

94. Indonesia

40.8

96. Costa Rica

40.7

97. Mauritius

40.6

98. Slovakia

40.5

99. Bahamas

40.0

99. Djibouti

40.0

99. Laos

40.0

99. Paraguay

40.0

99. Dominican Republic

40.0

99. Syria

40.0

99. Moldova

40.0

99. Tonga

40.0

99. Cyprus (Turkish Rep)

40.0

99. Yugoslavia

40.0

99. Liberia

40.0

99. Jamaica

40.0

99. Ethiopia

40.0

99. Tajikistan

40.0

99. Micronesia

40.0

99. Tuvalu

40.0

115. Panama

39.5

116. Seychelles

39.0

117. Andorra

39.0

118. Sri Lanka

38.7

118. Guatemala

38.7

118. Georgia

38.7

118. Cook Islands

38.7

122. Burkina Faso

38.4

123. Saudi Arabia

38.0

123. Vietnam

38.0

123. Barbados

38.0

123. Arab Emirates

38.0

123. Cyprus-Republic

38.0

128. Guinea

37.3

128. Mauritania

37.3

130. Pakistan

37.3

131. Mongolia

37.1

132. Russia

36.8

133. Portugal

36.4

134. St. Kitts

36.0

134. Peru

36.0

134. Rwanda

36.0

134. Palau

36.0

134. Eritrea

36.0

134. North Korea

36.0

134. Somalialand

36.0

134. Chad

36.0

134. Kiribati

36.0

134. Zimbabwe

36.0

134. Lesotho

36.0

134. St. Vincent

36.0

134. Antigua

36.0

134. Oman

36.0

134. Samoa

36.0

134. San Marino

36.0

134. Honduras

36.0

134. Madagascar

36.0

134. Sao Tome

36.0

134. Kazakhstan

36.0

154. Brunei

35.5

155. Algeria

35.2

156. Myanmar

34.9

156. Cameroon

34.9

158. Comoros

34.0

158. Albania

34.0

158. Mali

34.0

161. Tanzania

33.8

162. Iraq

33.6

163. Belarus

33.2

164. Bolivia

32.0

164. Ukraine

32.0

164. Monaco

32.0

164. Uruguay

32.0

164. Nicaragua

32.0

164. Ghana

32.0

164. Suriname

32.0

164. Gabon

32.0

164. Gambia

32.0

164. Afghanistan

32.0

164. Equatorial Guinea

32.0

164. Libya

32.0

164. Kuwait

32.0

164. Sierra Leone

32.0

164. Niger

32.0

164. Central Africa

32.0

164. Nigeria

32.0

164. Somalia

32.0

182. Solomon Islands

30.4

183. Niue

30.0

184. Bangladesh

29.3

185. Turkmenistan

28.0

185. Namibia

28.0

185. Congo Dem Rep

28.0

185. Bhutan

28.0

185. Ivory Coast

28.0

190. Uzbekistan

27.3

191. Benin

26.0

192. Papua New Guinea

25.3

193. Burundi

24.0

193. Congo (Rep)

24.0

193. Nauru

24.0

193. East Timor

24.0

197. Guinea-Bissau

20.0

198. Dominica

16.0

Among the other findings of this research include:

In the conclusion of the report, the research team presents a number of suggestions to improve navigation and provide access to information. One of the weaknesses of many national websites has been their inconsistency in terms of design features. Government agencies guard their autonomy very carefully, and it has taken a while to get agencies to work together to make the tasks of citizens easier to undertake.

Governments should promote features that allow citizens to post comments or otherwise provide feedback about a government agency. They also should consider market research, public opinion surveys, or focus groups that would provide them with information on how citizens feel about e-government websites and what features would attract them to use these sites.

One of the major challenges of e-government is the up-front costs of developing a website and putting information and services online. To deal with this issue, smaller and poorer countries should undertake regional e-government alliances that would allow them to pool resources and gain greater efficiency at building their infrastructure.

For more information on this study, contact Professor Darrell M. West of Brown University at (401) 863-1163 or email Darrell_West@brown.edu. The full Global E-Government Study is online at www.insidepolitcs.org. The Appendix of that report presents detailed profiles of each of the 198 national governments around the world.